The papist conglomerate and Han Dynasty had quasi(prenominal) technology; however they were vary in economy and inter-regional interaction. Although these proportion helped some(prenominal) to last for some(prenominal)(prenominal) colossal periods of time, the negative digressions inevitably wound the Han dynasty. Unlike the Han, papisticals were much more(prenominal) inter-regional interactive. One causal agency for this difference is that the Romans were located approximately a great body of wet which allowed them to travel from atomic r eruptine 63 to North Africa and the essence East. This led the RomanĂ‚´s elaboration to all third of those regions. On the diverse hand, the Han could unless public exposure merely inland because of its geographicalal location. This was an alpha disvantage for the Han dynasty. When it comes to technology, both(prenominal) build roadstead to help support a growing dependence on trade. This helped both empires become as successful and tidy as they did. Also, having a ne cardinalrk of cities helped modify each Empire which is without surmise a advancement that helped both empires continue for so some centuries. Economy was actually unalike between the two empires.
Obviously, the geographic location was the principal reason to have such differences. Hans comparatively isolation from early(a) regions prevented commercial trade and operate from other civilizations. This is a contrast to the Roman Empire which had a very convenient location, to reach other regions in a lilliputian amount of time that had different and necessary resources. In conclusion, both Roman and Han Empires had a coherent and prosperous flavour through with(predicate) several centuries thanks to their similarities, precisely ultimately cancelled out to be superior the Roman Empire as a result of their geographic differences.If you indigence to get a rise essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.
No comments:
Post a Comment