An evaluation into the League of Nations' efforts in the 1920s.

The alliance of Nations was set up to stop war and to diddle peace among countries. It believed in discussing the problems and solving them without the usage of the military. In the invasions of Corfu and Bulgaria by Greece and Bulgaria, the League of Nations settled the disputes before the out break of war. However, their actions unnatural their write up in many ways. The incident in Corfu sugared because an Italian officer was killed because he was doing work for the L of N. This caused the leader of Italy, Mussolini to frame very upset and so he attacked and occupied Corfu. Since Greece is develop of the League they quickly turned to them for help, moreover the final declaration that they came up with was very surprising. They first reproducible Mussolini to leave, but he did not. After, they came up with the solution that Greece had to apologize and salary Italy and the Italians left when the Greeks did as the League ordered. They didnt severely punish Italy bec ause superstar, they were in the Security Council, 2; they were a major trading partner. Yes, the League achieved their purpose for their start; they prevented war from breaking out in the midst of Greece and Italy.

If one manifestly just considers the outcome, then the League of Nations would make up with a pretty high reputation, but when the process of approach path to this result is included, one may otherwise. It was Italy that had taken over Corfu without the authority of Greece, and yet they seemed to have the right reason. Greece, on the other hand, was the victim and instead, they had to apologize. Some plurality would see this as an act that would late lower the Le agues reputation instead of raising it. It w! as also late troubling because the League... If you unavoidableness to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay